S3Sync.net
February 02, 2014, 01:33:13 PM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
S3Sync.net
>
General Category
>
Questions
>
to ssl or not?
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: to ssl or not? (Read 4139 times)
gilvago
Newbie
Posts: 2
to ssl or not?
«
on:
June 20, 2008, 04:29:29 AM »
Apologies for what is probably a naive question but... if I'm transmitting an encrypted file should I still use SSL? I'm assuming the transfer will be quicker if I don't use SSL - but does that then mean my s3 id and access key will be sent in plain text?
Logged
ferrix
Sr. Member
Posts: 363
(I am greg13070 on AWS forum)
Re: to ssl or not?
«
Reply #1 on:
June 20, 2008, 07:37:51 PM »
Quote from: gilvago on June 20, 2008, 04:29:29 AM
but does that then mean my s3 id and access key will be sent in plain text?
No S3 is designed to always protect your secret key. SSL is only for securing the contents of the nodes in-flight from eavesdropping.
Logged
gilvago
Newbie
Posts: 2
Re: to ssl or not?
«
Reply #2 on:
June 21, 2008, 12:54:00 PM »
Thanks ferrix
Logged
lejarrag
Newbie
Posts: 16
Re: to ssl or not?
«
Reply #3 on:
July 28, 2008, 01:43:43 PM »
SSL will also authenticate the AWS server, i.e., check that the server you are connected to effectively is the Amazon server. On the other hand, even banks sites do not routinely authenticate themselves, even though they use SSL to encrypt transactions. This, at least, is what I understand.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General Category
-----------------------------
=> Announcements
=> Questions
=> General Discussion
=> Report Bugs
===> Closed Bugs
=> Feature Requests
Loading...